<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>theCritical.de &#187; Royal Society</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theCritical.de/tag/royal-society/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theCritical.de</link>
	<description>Unbequemes von heute, gestern und morgen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Jun 2013 10:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>de-DE</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Lesetipp: Royal Society urged to restore culture of open-mindedness on climate science &amp; policy debates</title>
		<link>http://theCritical.de/2012/02/09/lesetipp-royal-society-urged-to-restore-culture-of-open-mindedness-on-climate-science-policy-debates/</link>
		<comments>http://theCritical.de/2012/02/09/lesetipp-royal-society-urged-to-restore-culture-of-open-mindedness-on-climate-science-policy-debates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 10:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Born]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fundstück]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimaschutz Contra Umweltschutz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leseempfehlungen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Klimawandel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wissenschaft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theCritical.de/?p=340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.achgut.com/dadgdx/index.php/dadgd/article/royal_society_urged_to_restore_culture_of_open_mindedness_on_climate_scienc/ &#160; &#8220;As the Society’s independence has disappeared, so has its former adherence to hard-nosed empirical science and a sober detachment from the political process. Gone are the doubts and uncertainties that afflict any real scientist, to be replaced with the dull certainties of the politician and the public relations man,” said Andrew Montford, author [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://theCritical.de/2012/02/09/lesetipp-royal-society-urged-to-restore-culture-of-open-mindedness-on-climate-science-policy-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
